B'NAI ELIM

B'NAI ELIM
Children of the Mighty

B'nai Elim Blogmaster's Disclaimer

Please note: The Blogmaster of this Blog is retired from B’nai Elim and was their former International Chairman and Chief of Intelligence and Security. Prior to forming B’nai Elim, he was a long time member and became the International Chairman of the Jewish Defense League, succeeding Irv Rubin (OBM) to that post. The items posted in this Blog do not necessarily reflect the opinions of B’nai Elim or its members and are the sole responsibility of the Blogmaster, Velvel ben Moshe, aka: Bill Maniaci who is currently the Director of "The Maccabee Group" doing Independent Intelligence Consulting & Analysis.

Set Your Watch with B'nai Elim Jerusalem Time

Jerusalem On Line - Channel 2 News from Israel

UN Doomsday Treaty With Ginny Simone

Showing posts with label MIDDLE EAST WAR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MIDDLE EAST WAR. Show all posts

14 August 2008

Largest U.S. Naval Buildup in 17 Years!!!

U.S RATTLING SABRE AND FLEXING NAVAL MIGHT IN PERSIAN GLUF...

PRELUDE TO JOINT U.S./ISRAELI STRIKE ON IRAN????

As we write, the arrival of new U.S. warships will mark the largest build-upof Naval forces in the Gulf since the 1991 Gulf War.
  • The aircraft carriers USS Theodore Roosevelt and the
  • USS Ronald Reagan,along with the
  • USS Iwo Jima, an Amphibious Assault Ship are sailing toward the Persian Gulf to reinforce the US strike forces in the region, along witha British Royal Navy carrier battle group and a French nuclear hunter-killersubmarine.

This move follows the ominous Operation Brimstone, a massive militaryexercise involving more than a dozen warships from the US, England, andFrance in the Atlantic Ocean in preparation for a possible confrontationwith Iran.

The USS Roosevelt, which participated in the just-concluded exercise, andthe USS Ronald Reagan will join two US naval battle groups in the area: theUSS Abraham Lincoln with its Carrier Strike Group Nine ; and the USSPeleliu, and Amphibious Assault Ship with its expeditionary strike group.

Naval forces now heading towards the Gulf include:

1. Carrier Strike Group Nine:

  • USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN72) nuclear powered carrier with its Carrier AirWing TwoDestroyer Squadron Nine:
  • USS Mobile Bay (CG53) guided missile cruiser
  • USS Russell (DDG59) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Momsen (DDG92) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Shoup (DDG86) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Ford (FFG54) guided missile frigate
  • USS Ingraham (FFG61) guided missile frigate
  • USS Rodney M. Davis (FFG60) guided missile frigate
  • USS Curts (FFG38) guided missile frigate
  • Plus one or more nuclear hunter-killer submarines

2. Peleliu Expeditionary Strike Group:

  • USS Peleliu (LHA-5) a Tarawa-class amphibious assault carrier
  • USS Pearl Harbor (LSD52) assult ship
  • USS Dubuque (LPD8) assult ship/landing dock
  • USS Cape St. George (CG71) guided missile cruiser
  • USS Halsey (DDG97) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Benfold (DDG65) guided missile destroyer

3.Carrier Strike Group Two:

  • USS Theodore Roosevelt (DVN71) nuclear powered carrier with its Carrier AirWing EightDestroyer Squadron 22:
  • USS Monterey (CG61) guided missile cruiser
  • USS Mason (DDG87) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Nitze (DDG94) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Sullivans (DDG68) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Springfield (SSN761) nuclear powered hunter-killer submarine

IWO ESG ~ Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group

  • USS Iwo Jima (LHD7) amphibious assault carrier with its Amphibious SquadronFourand with its 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit
  • USS San Antonio (LPD17) assault ship
  • USS Velia Gulf (CG72) guided missile cruiser
  • USS Ramage (DDG61) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Carter Hall (LSD50) assault ship
  • USS Roosevelt (DDG80) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Hartfore (SSN768) nuclear powered hunter-killer submarine

Carrier Strike Group Seven:

  • USS Ronald Reagan (CVN76) nuclear powered carrier with its Carrier Air Wing14

Destroyer Squadron 7:

  • USS Chancellorsville (CG62) guided missile cruiser
  • USS Howard (DDG83) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Gridley (DDG101) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Decatur (DDG73) guided missile destroyer
  • USS Thach (FFG43) guided missile frigate
  • USNS Rainier (T-AOE-7) fast combat support ship

This massive deployment means that hundreds of nuclear-armed warplanes,thousands of troops, and destroyers capable of launching cruise missilescarrying nuclear weapons, bunker busters, or fragmentation bombs will beavailable for a strike on Iran.

While Russia is bogged down with the crisisin Georgia, and China is occupied with the Olympics, the Bush Administrationmay believe that this is an opportune time to strike.

This massivedeployment is occurring as both Houses of Congress are set to approveresolutions that would mandate a U.S. blockade (which is an act of war underinternational law).

07 July 2008

Canadian Press Says Israel Will Start All-Out Middle East War

02:31 7/7/2008

New war brewing...

U.S., Israel take dangerous steps

By ERIC MARGOLIS

GENEVA -- The U.S., Israel and Iran are playing a very dangerous game of chicken that soon could result in a new Mideast war.

U.S. intelligence has concluded that Iran is not working on nuclear weapons. But the Bush administration and Israel, recently joined by France, are issuing increasingly loud threats of military action to frighten Iran into halting its nuclear enrichment program.

Iran insists its nuclear program is entirely for civilian use. Tehran is alternating between conciliatory statements and threats to retaliate against any attack by inflicting economic chaos on the global economy. Europe fears the economic damage a war against Iran would bring far more than Iran's nuclear program.

Senior Israeli officials are openly threatening to attack Iran's nuclear installations before President George W. Bush's term expires. Early, this month Israel staged a large, U.S.-approved exercise using F-15s and F-16s to rehearse an attack over 900 miles - precisely the distance to Iran's nuclear facilities.

The highly regarded American journalist Seymour Hersh just confirmed that the U.S. Congress authorized a $400-million plan to overthrow Iran's government and incite ethnic unrest. This column reported a year ago that U.S. and British special forces were operating in Iran, preparing for a massive air campaign. Israel's destruction of an alleged Syrian reactor last fall was a warning to Iran.

This week a Pentagon official claimed an Israeli attack on Iran was coming before year end.
Other Pentagon and CIA sources say a U.S. attack on Iran is imminent, with or without Israel. The Bush administration is even considering using small tactical nuclear weapons against deeply buried Iranian targets.


Senior American officers Admiral William Fallon and Air Force Chief Michael Mosley recently were fired for opposing war against Iran. According to Israel's media, President Bush even told Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that he could not trust America's intelligence community and preferred to rely on Israeli intelligence.

AIR BLITZ

Intensifying activity is evident at U.S. bases in Europe and the Gulf, aimed at preparing a massive air blitz that may include repeated attacks on 3,100 targets in Iran. Other sources say Iranian Revolutionary Guard installations will be barraged by cruise missiles.

In Washington, Congress, under intense pressure from the Israel lobby, is about to adopt a resolution calling for a naval blockade of Iran, an overt act of war.

Pro-Israel groups have been airing TV commercials claiming Iran is attacking American troops in Iraq and threatens the U.S.

The Bush administration's last desperate act, its Gotterdammerung, could be war with Iran. UN weapons inspectors concur with U.S. intelligence that there is no proof Iran is working on nuclear arms, but the neocon war party in Washington is determined to loosen a final Parthian shaft by striking Iran.

Israel asserts the right to maintain its Mideast nuclear monopoly by destroying all fissile-producing reactors in the region. Iran vows to retaliate against Israel with its inaccurate Shahab missiles, shut the Strait of Hormuz and mine the Gulf, producing worldwide financial panic, severe fuel shortages, and $400-$500 per barrel oil. Iran likely will attack U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Iraq and Kuwait, and strike Saudi and Kuwaiti oil facilities. Canadians in Afghanistan could also become targets.

GRAVE DAMAGE

The embattled Bush administration's bunker mentality is leading to war that will gravely damage long-term U.S. Mideast interests. A single Iranian missile hit on Israel's reactor would do more damage to the Jewish state than all its previous wars. Besides, Israel cannot destroy Iran's nuclear infrastructure. A U.S. or Israeli attack on Iran will guarantee Tehran decides to build nuclear weapons. Israel and Iran have turned their regional rivalry into a confrontation that threatens all.

Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, not its bombastic President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, controls that nation's military and insists Iran will not produce nuclear weapons. Israel claims it faces a second holocaust. Iran says Israel's nuclear forces threaten its existence.
The dogs of war are being unleashed.

13 April 2008

HASSAN NASRALLAH, HIZBOLLAH ARCH TERORIST WARNS ISRAEL!

Blogmaster's comment: Towards the end of this informative piece is the bold assertion that it is "obvious" that Israeli Border Police were "bribed" by Hezbollah and handed over Israeli Air Force tactical reconnaissance photographs which enabled the enemy to know prior to an attack which targets would be bombed by the IAF. I have heard via other sources similar tales of treason by members of the IDF or Border Police. We must not be complacent in matters of national security. Hezbullah is funded by Iran and the Iranians would gleefully pay huge sums to entice an Israeli to betray his country. Such revelations, unsubstianted as they are, tend to undermine the moral of, and cast disparaging shadows upon the 99.99% of the honorable members of the Israel Defense Forces. This should not be the case. Our soldiers should be honored and thanked at every opportunity for their service and the protection they provide to all of us. Be observant however, for someone who spends beyond their means or seems to have newly found unexplained wealth. If such a person is in a position of trust with access to classified information, some further investigation should be warranted.

ISSN: 1391 - 0531
Sunday April 13, 2008
Vol. 42 - No 46
International

Hizbollah turns to Iran for new weapons


to wage war on Israel

By Robert Fisk
in Teir Dibba, south Lebanon

The Shia "martyrs" of this hill village are normally killed in the dangerous, stony landscape of southern Lebanon, in Israeli air raids or invasions or attacks from the sea. The Hizbollah duly honours them. But the body of the latest Shia fighter to be buried here - from the local Hashem family - was flown back to Lebanon last month from Iran.
He was hailed as a martyr in the village Husseiniya mosque but the Hizbollah would say no more. For when a Lebanese is killed in live firing exercises in the Islamic Republic, his death brings almost as many questions as mourners.

Yet it is an open secret south of the Litani river that thousands of young men have been leaving their villages for military training in Iran. Up to 300 men are taken to Beirut en route to Tehran each month and the operation has been running since November of 2006; in all, as many as 4,500 Hizbollah members have been sent for three-month sessions of live-fire ammunition and rocket exercises to create a nucleus of Iranian-trained guerrillas for the "next" Israeli-Hizbollah war.

Troops with the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol an area on the Lebanese-Israeli border on Thursday. UNIFIL began erecting a barbed wire fence along the Lebanese-Israeli border today in order to prevent drug trafficking in the area and breaches of the Blue Line. AFP

Whether this frightening conflict takes place will depend on President Bush's behaviour. If America - or its proxy, Israel - bombs Iran, the response is likely to be swift and will come from the deep underground bunkers that the Hizbollah has been building in the fields and beside the roadways east and south of Jezzine.

For months, Sayed Hassan Nasrallah, the Hizbollah leader, has been warning Israel that his organisation has a "surprise" new weapon in its armoury and there are few in Lebanon who do not suspect that this is a new Iranian-developed ground-to-air missile - rockets which may at last challenge Israel's air supremacy over Lebanon. For more than 30 years, Israel's fighter-bombers have had the skies to themselves, losing only two aircraft - one to a primitive Palestinian SAM-7 shoulder-fired missile, the other to Syrian anti-aircraft guns - during and after its 1982 invasion.

After its 1980-88 war with Iraq, Iran introduced a new generation of weapons, one of which — a development of a Chinese sea-to-sea missile - almost sank an Israeli corvette in the last Hizbollah-Israeli war in 2006.

Can the Hizbollah shoot Israeli jets out of the sky in the event of another conflict? It is a question much discussed within the 13,000-strong United Nations force in southern Lebanon — essentially a Nato-led army, which contains French, Spanish and Italian troops as well as Chinese, Indian and sundry other contingents - which would find itself sandwiched between the two antagonists.

There are no armed Hizbollah fighters in their area of operations — Nasrallah respects the UN resolution which placed the peacekeepers between the Israeli border and the Litani in 2006 — but the UN mission, along with its soldiers, will be gravely endangered in the event of another war.

If its aircraft could no longer bomb at will over Lebanon without fear of being destroyed, would Israel stage another costly land invasion - highly unlikely after the bloodying its troops took in 2006 - or use its own ground-to-ground missiles on Lebanon?

For if the latter option were chosen, it would bring a whole new dimension to Lebanon's repeated wars. Long-range missiles have proved hopelessly inaccurate in Middle East conflicts and the Iran-Iraq war. But whatever political sins they still commit, the Lebanese - despite their current crisis - appear to have rejected any return to civil war. In such a war, no one could repeat the old lies about "pinpoint accuracy".

The government of Fouad Siniora may be trapped in its own "Green Zone" in central Beirut - it even refused to attend the Arab League summit in Damascus - and parliament is suspended after 17 vain sessions to elect a president. A series of prominent Lebanese MPs and journalists have been murdered or attacked since 2005 but Syrian troops have left and the Lebanese army still manages to keep a form of order on the streets. However, the Syrian intelligence presence has been maintained in Lebanon - and Syria is Iran's only ally in the Arab world. This does not mean that war is inevitable.

So the future of Lebanon remains - as it did in 2006 - in the hands of the United States and Iran. Just as the Israelis constantly warn of war, so the Hizbollah still promises revenge for the car-bomb murder of its former intelligence officer Imad Mougnieh in Damascus in February. Regularly, the Israelis warn that they will respond to attacks but that they will "choose the moment and the place and the means".

And sure enough - following the Hizbollah's pattern of using Israel's own words - Nasrallah said on 24 March that the Hizbollah would "choose the moment and the place and the means" to retaliate for Mougnieh's death. And each month, the Hizballoh improves its new bunkers north of the Litani. Some now sprout aerials but they may be "dummies" for Israel's pilots to attack.

Deep underground telephone land-lines have been laid to those which are visible and to those others which are beneath the surface. The Hizbollah learned a lot from the 2006 war. Then its secret bunkers were air-conditioned with beds and kitchens attached. But when Israeli troops discovered a handful of them, they also found copies of their own Israeli air force reconnaissance photographs, complete with Hebrew markings.
The Hizbollah had obviously bribed or blackmailed Israeli border guards for the pictures - from which they could tell at once which bunkers the Israelis had identified and which remained unknown to them. (Emphases added)

Which is how, in 2006, its guerrillas sat safely through days of air bombardment in the latter, while allowing the Israelis to blitz the "known" fortresses to their hearts' content. Who knows if the Hizbollah has not since collected a new batch of photographs for the coming months?

Courtesy Independent, UK

© Copyright 2008 Wijeya Newspapers Ltd.Colombo. Sri Lanka. All Rights Reserved.

20 July 2007

THERE IS A NEW SNAKE IN TOWN

Blogmaster's Comments: There is a new snake in town and it is preparing to strike in the Middle East and in Egypt in particular. I have seen intelligence information which indicates that fighters from the "Islamic Maghreb" have infiltrated into Egypt with a sizable quantity of explosives and weapons. Their intended targets are believed to be areas where tourists are apt to be heavily concentrated and Metro lines in Cairo. Their intent is to de-stabilize and embarass the Egyptian secular government and to recruit more into their ranks.They also seek to divert attention away from Hamas and the activities of Syria and Iran. Violence is not limited to attacks against Israel. Analysts recommend all organizations with interests in Egypt, specifically Cairo, and tourist interests country-wide, to refrain from the use of the Cairo Metro and other transportation nodes and to stay clear of large crowds at the nation's tourist sites.

Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb

(aka Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat)

The items below will be addressed in this article:

  • Introduction

  • What is al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb?

  • What’s the connection between GSPC and al-Qaeda?

  • What are GSPC’s goals?

  • What are the group’s tactics?

  • Is the group capable of carrying out global attacks?

  • Who are the group’s main leaders?

  • How is the group funded?

  • Does the recent name change represent a resurgence of the GSPC?

  • Why is North Africa susceptible to Islamic terrorism?

  • Does GSPC have a significant presence in Iraq?


Introduction


Reports from North Africa point to a recent resurgence in terrorist activity by several local Islamist movements, the most prominent of which is the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC). An Algeria-based Sunni group that recently renamed itself al-Qaeda in the
Islamic Maghreb, the organization has taken responsibility for a number of terrorist attacks in the region, declared its intention to attack Western targets, and sent a squad of jihadis to
Iraq. Experts believe these actions suggest widening ambitions within the group’s leadership, now pursuing a more global, sophisticated and better-financed direction. Long categorized as part of a strictly domestic insurgency against Algeria’s military government, GSPC claims to be the local franchise operation for al-Qaeda, a worrying development for a region which has
been relatively peaceful since the bloody Algerian civil war of the 1990s drew to a close.



What is al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb?


The group originated as an armed Islamist resistance movement to the secular Algerian government. Its insurrection began after Algeria’s military regime canceled the second round of parliamentary elections in 1992 after it became clear the Islamic Salvation Front, a coalition of Islamist militants and moderates, might win and take power. The GSPC declared its independence from another insurgent group, the Armed Islamic Group (GIA) in 1998, believing the GIA’s brutal tactics were hurting the Islamist cause. The GSPC gained support from the Algerian population by vowing to continue fighting while avoiding the indiscriminate killing of civilians. The group has since surpassed the GIA in influence and numbers to become the primary force for Islamism in Algeria, with the majority of its members refusing government offers of amnesty after Algeria’s civil war of the mid-1990s. According to a 2005
U.S. State Department report (PDF) on terrorism, its ranks have dwindled to only a few hundred from nearly 28,000 at the height of its power.



What’s the connection between GSPC and al-Qaeda?



Collusion between the GSPC and al-Qaeda is not a new phenomenon. According to a report by Emily Hunt of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Osama bin Laden provided funding for Algerian Islamists in the early 1990s and was involved in the GSPC’s early formation. Many of the group’s founding members trained in al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan. The GSPC declared its allegiance to al-Qaeda as early as 2003, but al-Qaeda’s second-in-command, Ayman al-Zawahari, officially approved GSPC’s merger in a videotape released on September 11, 2006. The GSPC claimed responsibility for February 2007 attacks against Algerian police stations under its new name.



What are GSPC’s goals?


Originally, its aims included the overthrow of Algeria’s secular, military government and the establishment of an Islamic caliphate, a theocracy based on Islamic law that for twelve
centuries spanned the Muslim world. Counterterrorism experts, however, say the group’s folding into the global al-Qaeda structure may indicate a shift to take up the banner of global jihad and collude on future attacks in
North Africa, Western Europe, and Iraq. “Pressed by Algerian counterterrorism successes, the once Algeria-centric GSPC has become a regional terrorist organization, recruiting and operation all throughout the Maghreb—and beyond to Europe itself,” said Harry Crumpton, the U.S. ambassador at large for counterterrorism, during an April 2006 Senate testimony (PDF). In a January speech, Abu Musab Abdel Wadoud, the GSPC commander, declared solidarity (PDF) with Islamists in the Palestinian territories, Iraq, Somalia and Chechnya.

Hugh Roberts, head of the International Crisis Group’s North Africa project, says it’s too early to tell if its new allegiance to al-Qaeda will shift its mission statement or operational
strategies to take on an international role beyond
Algeria’s borders. “We need to wait and see is if it starts operating as a regional attachment of the global jihad,” he says. “Plenty of
people are worried that it’s going to do this. So far we haven’t really seen it.”



What are the group’s tactics?



The GSPC employs conventional terrorist tactics (PDF) to achieve its objectives in Algeria, including guerilla-style ambushes against military personnel and truck bombs against government targets, according to the Center for Policing Terrorism (CPT) at the Manhattan Institute. GSPC militants kidnapped thirty-two European tourists traveling in the Algerian Sahara in February 2003. Money from the kidnapped victims’ ransom is alleged to have purchased surface-to-air missiles, heavy machine guns, mortars, and satellite-positioning
equipment. In December 2006, the group attacked two buses carrying contractors near
Algiers, wounding several foreign nationals. Four months later, the group killed twenty three people with twin bombings in Algiers. One of the bombs exploded outside the prime
minister’s office, a move
CFR Fellow Steven A. Cook describes as “a major escalation.”


Some experts warn the group’s growing confidence could increase its willingness to target Westerners both inside and outside Algeria. The GSPC has also taken over, and some say
revitalized, many of the Europe-based cells of the former GIA both for the purpose of fundraising and for launching attacks.



Is the group capable of carrying out global attacks?



Analysts point to thwarted attacks in France and several arrests of GSPC-linked groups as evidence the group is capable of attacks in Western Europe. Authorities arrested
a London-based GSPC militant who conspired to launch a chemical attack, and
arrested four members of a GSPC cell in
Frankfurt for possession of chemicals and arms. In spite of this, some experts doubt their ability to carry out an al-Qaeda-scale attack. “They haven’t done aything spectacular,” says Roberts. “They have not actually pulled off a
single terrorist attack in
Europe in the eight years they’ve existed. And that’s a fact
that you have to put in balance against European security services that say the
group is a major threat.”



Who are the group’s main leaders?



After the 1979-1989 jihad against the Soviets in Afghanistan, hundreds of North African volunteers known as “Afghan Arabs” returned to the region and radicalized Islamist movements in North Africa. Most of the group’s main leaders are believed to have trained in Afghanistan. Within Algeria, leadership is essentially divided into northern and
southern groups.

  • Abu
    Musab Abdulwadood
    . The current chief of the northern group, also known
    as Abdelmalek Droukdel, is a former university science student turned bomb
    maker. He has led the group since September 2004 after the previous
    leader, Nabil Sahraoui, was killed in a firefight with Algerian forces in
    June of that year.

  • Mokhtar Belmokhtar. Known as the "One-eyed," Belmokhtar is a former
    Algerian soldier who spent time fighting in Afghanistan. He allegedly joined the group through his role as the leader of a smuggling gang, which subsequently joined the GSPC. According to Hunt’s report, his family connections allow the group to capitalize on
    criminal opportunities in the South, such as smuggling. He was reportedly
    killed in northern Mali, but Algerian authorities have yet to confirm his death.

  • Ammari Saifi. Also known as Abderrazak the Para because he was trained as an Algerian special forces paratrooper, Saifi organized the 2003 kidnapping of European tourists in
    the Algerian Sahara. He was known as the “Bin Laden of the desert” and
    designated as a “Specially Designated Global Terrorist” by the United States, a classification shared by top al-Qaeda commanders before he was captured by a Chadian rebel group, the Movement for Democracy and Justice in Chad (MDJC) and eventually extradited to Algeria.

How is the group funded?



Smuggling and petty crimes are a lucrative source of income, according to the CPT report. The porous, unpoliced borders of the Sahara region make smuggling vehicles, cigarettes, drugs, and arms particularly easy. The organization’s operatives in Europe may provide new forms of income through theft and document forgery carried out by new recruits, according to the report. The ransom paid as a result of the 2003 kidnapping also provided a significant
windfall for the group. Algerian authorities accuse
Iran and Sudan of giving material support to the GSPC, but experts say such support is unlikely.

Does the recent name change represent a resurgence of the GSPC?



Algeria-watchers are divided as to whether it signifies a new resurgence of Algerian Islamism or is simply a public relations move. Algerian authorities consider the shift to be a last-ditch attempt to revitalize a domestic insurgent movement enfeebled by years of combat and
internal divisions. The Algerian state, however, has been known to suppress reporting on the real strength of insurgent groups in
Algeria, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.



Indeed, there are indications that terrorism in North Africa is on the rise and that the GSPC is alive and well in Algeria. “Despite the official happy talk,” says Olivier Guitta, a Washington-based foreign affairs consultant, “kidnappings by Islamists to raise money for their cause are a routine occurrence in Algeria. And not a day goes by without terrorists' attacking military personnel, government employees, or ordinary civilians, whom they regard as allies of the government.”

The group is reported to have cross-border association with separatist groups in Niger, Chad, Mauritania, and Libya, in addition to Islamist organizations in Tunisia, Libya, and Morocco. But the name change doesn’t necessarily indicate a pan-Maghreb al-Qaeda front. “The most we can say is that the GSPC has had contact with these groups,” says Roberts of the International Crisis Group. “But the change of name is not a sign of unification of these groups.”



Why is North Africa susceptible to Islamic terrorism?


North Africa is culturally and geographically distant from more radical strains of Islam in the Middle East. Experts say although the population doesn’t condone al-Qaeda-style terrorism, political Islam has given people a means of social criticism under otherwise repressive regimes. As Ray Takeyh, a senior CFR fellow, points out, “An increasingly disillusioned
middle class turned to the Islamists and their devastating critique of the prevailing order.” Unemployment is high in the region, and there are large numbers of young people, two factors that could fuel terrorist activity. Emily Hunt observes that for those who would join terrorist groups, “al-Qaeda’s global ideology intersects with local anger directed at undemocratic regimes that for years allowed mosques to be focal points of popular political
activity.”



Does GSPC have a significant presence in Iraq?


Yes. The GSPC has funneled North African insurgents to Iraq to fight as suicide bombers, foot soldiers, and mid-level commanders, says Hunt. Although counting foreign fighters is
difficult, Evan F. Kohlmann, a terrorism consultant, estimates that North Africans represent
between 9 percent and 25 percent of foreign fighters in Iraq are from North Africa, although the vast majority are still of Saudi and Jordanian origin. “They’re a significant but not dominant presence,” he says. Adil Sakir al-Mukni—a key link between the GSPC and al-Qaeda in
Iraq, a group of foreign jihadis founded by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi—was deported by the Syrian government for helping shuttle foreign fighters into Iraq. The GSPC reportedly called on the Zarqawi network to attack French nationals in Iraq and applauded the 2005 killing of two Algerian diplomats there.

12 July 2007

IDF PREPARES FOR WAR

IDF wary of possible war with Syria



Predicting that war with Syria could erupt if Prime Minister Ehud Olmert does not begin peace negotiations with Damascus, the latest IDF assessment also states that such a conflict would be "at least 10 times worse" than last summer's conflict with Hizbullah.

Military Intelligence is also identifying and pinpointing targets for the IDF in the event that a strike is launched against Iran's nuclear facilities.

  • Syria rejects offer to hold peace talks
  • Rubin: Getting serious about Syria

    MI recently established a new division to translate intelligence into concrete targets and information that can be used by units in the field.

    The new division is headed by Brig.-Gen. Nitzan Alon, a former commander of the General Staff's Reconnaissance Unit (Sayeret Matkal.) The Israel Air Force has its own department that is responsible for processing intelligence and identifying targets.

    According to IDF assessments, Syria is not interested in an armed confrontation, but has stepped up its preparations for war since last year's Israel-Hizbullah conflict.

    Due to the lack of communication between the two countries, the IDF assessment is that a war could erupt sometime in the coming year if a diplomatic resolution is not reached first.

    If war breaks out, the IDF believes Syria would fire thousands of long- and short-range missiles at Israeli cities.

    The assumption is that a war with Syria would erupt due to a "miscalculation" along the border, in the form of a terrorist attack that escalates into a larger conflict.

    Syria has come to believe that the United States will attack Iran this summer, and that as a result, Israel will once more go to war with Hizbullah. If that happens, Syria believes Israel will not confine its operations to Lebanon, but will also strike Syrian targets.

    Syria has transferred several hundred medium-range missiles to Hizbullah, The Jerusalem Post has learned, which has completely replenished its weapon supplies, exhausted during last summer's war. The missiles include 220-mm. and 302-mm. Katyusha rockets that have ranges of up to 60 kilometers.

    The IDF suspects that Hizbullah may have received more advanced Iranian and Syrian missiles, with the assumption being that any weapon small enough to fit into a standard 12-meter shipping container has been sent to the guerrilla group by the two countries.

    Turning to Iran, the assumption is that Teheran will continue to advance with its nuclear program, in defiance of United Nations-imposed sanctions and resolutions.

    According to the most pessimistic estimates in the defense establishment, Iran will obtain a nuclear bomb by mid-2009, although the chances of this happening are seen as slim and it is more likely that the Islamic Republic will only succeed in manufacturing a nuclear device in 2010 or 2011.

    The IDF believes that within the next six months, Iran will cross the technological threshold, obtaining independent research and development capabilities and mastering the technology needed to enrich uranium.

    According to the IDF assessment, a military strike could cause enough damage to dramatically set back Iran's nuclear program.

    The Iranian regime is believed to be strong and Israel does not believe that it can currently be toppled.

    Concerning Hizbullah, Israel says the IDF killed some 600 gunmen during the war last summer, a tenth of the group's armed men. The guerrilla group is having trouble recruiting new guerrillas into its ranks, according to the IDF.

    The growing assumption in the IDF is that Hizbullah is not currently interested in another round of fighting with Israel and that it is rehabilitating its damaged infrastructure. The assumption is that Hizbullah will recover by mid-2008 and might renew attacks against Israel.

    Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah remains a target for the IDF, although the assumption within the defense establishment is that the guerrilla group would respond harshly if he were killed.
    This article can also be read at http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1184063445286&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

  • Copyright 1995-2007 The Jerusalem Post - http://www.jpost.com/
  • Colonel Richard Kemp, British Army - Comment on the IDF's Actions in Gaza

    Radical Islams Plans for Western Civilization

    THE THIRD JIHAD - WATCH THIS IMPORTANT FILM NOW - FREE

    Obama's true agenda...Throw Israel Under the Bus

    ****Regarding Obama’s Speech before the U.N. Obama has surpassed the peanut farmer Jimmy Carter as the worst and most anti-Israel, anti-Semitic, Arabist President who has ever occupied the White House. Not only is he is a narcissistic moron who is dragging America into an abyss; Obama is the most dangerous threat to World Freedom, Liberty and Western Civilization since Hitler. (Blogmaster)

    Senator Joe Leiberman 'Islamist Extremist Regime'

    JOHN VOIGHT ON OBAMA'S DISTAIN FOR ISRAEL

    CHAZAK CHAZAK

    ON THE PATH TO MUSLIM DOMINATION - REVERSABLE? STOPPABLE?

    2 STATE SOLUTION - COMMENTARY BY THE "18"

    A message to the Jewish people and the entire world

    Chronicles I - 16:15-18: "Forever remember His covenant that he commanded forever; That He made with Abraham and swore to Isaac; and confirmed in a decree for Jacob, for Israel, as an eternal covenant; saying to You I will give the Land of Cannan as your alloted heritage"

    WE ARE THANKFUL FOR OUR SOLDIERS - G_D BLESS THE IDF

    Israel Security Agency

    Israel Security Agency
    Shin Bet - Protecting Israel's Security 24/7

    ISRAEL - WE'RE 60 AND PROUD OF IT!

    Jerusalem of Gold, Israel's capital for 3300 years

    The Music and Songs of Ofra Haza (OBM)

    DON'T MESS WITH THE BEST - IDF GOLAN - ISRAEL

    Maccabee Arms Ltd. Products..."LOOK"